No overclaim
We do not claim that a measured building is risk-free.
Editorial standards
How Hygiene Intelligence keeps public claims evidence-led and careful.
Hygiene Intelligence public pages are written to help people understand independent hygiene measurement without overstating what a point-in-time evidence record can prove. Content is owned by Hygiene Intelligence and Tech Hygiene Limited, then reviewed for product accuracy, evidence wording, and public/private boundaries before publication.
Short answer
Our editorial rule is simple: describe what was measured, what the output means, what remains private, and what the evidence does not claim.
What we review before publishing
Search engines and AI answer systems reward content that is clear, specific, and trustworthy. These checks keep the public site useful for buyers while protecting the integrity of private evidence records.
| Review check | Standard |
|---|---|
| Evidence wording | Public language must describe measured evidence without turning it into a safety guarantee or certification claim. |
| Public/private boundary | Raw readings, operational detail, and private reports stay controlled unless a client approves summary publication. |
| Product accuracy | Content should explain what Hygiene Intelligence does today: independent measurement, private reports, and approved public profiles. |
| Source quality | Where third-party guidance is useful, content should favour official, industry, academic, or primary sources over vague commentary. |
| Buyer usefulness | Pages should answer the real question a facilities, workplace, property, or tenant stakeholder would ask. |
What Hygiene Intelligence does not claim
The platform is strongest when its claims stay measured. These limits apply across landing pages, guides, blog content, public profiles, and commercial explanations.
No overclaim
We do not describe Hygiene Intelligence as a regulator, certifier, or cleaning contractor.
No overclaim
We do not publish private reports or raw readings as public content by default.
No overclaim
We do not imply medical, legal, or health-outcome guarantees from a point-in-time surface measurement.
Sources
When a page uses outside context, it should separate first-party product facts from third-party hygiene, workplace, or facilities guidance.
Updates
Dated guides and public pages should be refreshed when product scope, public wording, or source context changes materially.
Corrections
Correction requests should be reviewed through the contact route and handled by updating the affected public page where appropriate.
Correction and update policy
If a public page is unclear, outdated, or too broad, Hygiene Intelligence should update the visible wording and matching structured data together. Corrections should preserve the public/private evidence boundary and avoid inventing credentials, partnerships, case studies, or claims that have not been approved for publication.
FAQs
Who reviews Hygiene Intelligence public content?
Public content is owned by Hygiene Intelligence and Tech Hygiene Limited. It is reviewed for product accuracy, evidence wording, public/private boundaries, and whether claims match the visible page content.
Why does Hygiene Intelligence avoid safety-certification language?
The platform creates point-in-time hygiene evidence for selected shared surfaces. That evidence is useful, but it should not be exaggerated into a guarantee that a whole building is safe or risk-free.
Are Hygiene Intelligence guides medical or legal advice?
No. Guides are written to help building, facilities, and workplace teams understand independent hygiene measurement and evidence workflows. They are not medical, legal, or regulatory advice.
How can someone request a correction?
Corrections can be requested through the contact page. Hygiene Intelligence should review the affected page, update the wording where needed, and keep public claims aligned with the evidence available.